Battery research

Drone Battery Sourcing and Procurement

Explore supplier product evidence, named installations and U.S. procurement frameworks. The sourcing view separates a published product claim from the documentation needed for a particular contract.

How to read this evidence

A manufacturing location, catalog listing or company statement does not certify a battery SKU. TAA origin and non-FEOC sourcing require separate, procurement-specific assessments.

Supplier evidence has a defined scope

A catalog page can establish an offered product and its stated specifications. It does not establish a customer relationship, aircraft installation or delivery volume. OEM research coverage identifies subjects for further evidence review.

Read the applicable authority

FAR trade-agreement rules address covered procurement and origin. DoD battery restrictions have their own scope, phased dates, component tests and exceptions. Use the linked current authority and exact solicitation clauses before classifying a product.

Explore the evidence

Choose a table and open a record to review its source, date and limitations. Search and category selections stay within this view.

Public sample
Fixed public sample
2
Supplier and cell evidence · unfiltered sample rows
Retained catalog coverage
4
Rows in this dataset; not a market total
Catalog reference period
2026-10-27
Each record retains its own source date
Current access
Public preview
Additional records require module permission

Supplier and cell evidence

Supplier catalog products and documented installations are separate. A supplier offering alone does not establish an aircraft design win or market share.

Checking module access; public evidence remains available.

2 matching sample records · 2 fixed public records before filters. Catalog coverage: 4 retained rows. Counts describe research rows with the scope stated above.

Supplier and cell evidence. Expand a record for evidence, limitations and source links.
Record and evidenceSupplierProductCell formPublished specificationEvidence typeEvidence limit
Tattu 23000 mAh 6S1P LiHVOpen evidence and sources

Evidence record C02

Supplier
Grepow / Tattu
Product
Tattu 23000 mAh 6S1P LiHV
Product type
Supplier battery pack
Cell form
Pouch
Published specification
23Ah
Evidence type
Supplier product offering
Evidence limit
Vendor-marketed pouch pack; OEM deployment unidentified
Related installed configurations
Not established
TAA assessment
Not assessed
Non-FEOC assessment
Not assessed
Source references
  • S11
Verification status
Primary source checked for the specified claims
Source publication dates
S11
Undated
Source check date
2026-11-01
Research cutoff
2026-10-27
Source References
  • Publisher
    Grepow / Tattu
    Reported publication date
    Undated
    Source URL
    grepow.com
    Supported claim
    Supplier catalog: 23Ah 6S1P LiHV pouch UAV battery pack
    Source check date
    2026-11-01
    Observed document date
    Not established
    Observed document version
    Not established
    Observed final source URL
    grepow.com
    What was checked
    Vendor page offers a 23,000 mAh, 6S1P, 22.8 V pouch UAV battery pack. It does not identify an installed aircraft.

Source documents

Supporting source scope

Grepow / Tattu · Undated

Supplier catalog: 23Ah 6S1P LiHV pouch UAV battery pack

Primary source checked for the specified claims

Grepow / TattuTattu 23000 mAh 6S1P LiHVPouch23AhSupplier product offeringVendor-marketed pouch pack; OEM deployment unidentified
INR18650-25ROpen evidence and sources

Evidence record C03

Supplier
Samsung SDI / distributor validation
Product
INR18650-25R
Product type
Wingtra 4S3P cell
Cell form
Cylindrical
Published specification
18650
Evidence type
Named aircraft installation
Evidence limit
Wingtra original technical PDF names Samsung cell; installed within Wingtra Gen II
Related installed configurations
  • B01
TAA assessment
Not assessed
Non-FEOC assessment
Not assessed
Source references
  • S05
Verification status
Primary source checked for the specified claims
Source publication dates
S05
2024-08
Source check date
2026-11-01
Research cutoff
2026-10-27
Source References
  • Publisher
    Wingtra
    Reported publication date
    2024-08
    Source URL
    wingtra.com
    Supported claim
    WingtraOne Gen II: Samsung INR 18650 25R, 4S3P, two 99 Wh packs
    Source check date
    2026-11-01
    Observed document date
    Not established
    Observed document version
    Not established
    Observed final source URL
    wingtra.com
    What was checked
    August 2024 technical PDF supports two 99 Wh Li-ion packs, Samsung INR18650-25R and 4s3p configuration. Twelve cells per pack and 24 installed cells are arithmetic from the configuration, not shipments.

Source documents

Supporting source scope

Wingtra · 2024-08

WingtraOne Gen II: Samsung INR 18650 25R, 4S3P, two 99 Wh packs

Primary source checked for the specified claims

Samsung SDI / distributor validationINR18650-25RCylindrical18650Named aircraft installationWingtra original technical PDF names Samsung cell; installed within Wingtra Gen II

Explore the complete research

The public sample demonstrates the evidence structure. Request a demo to discuss the scope and access to approved drone battery research. Signing in alone does not grant a module license.

Research questions

Does a designated-country factory prove TAA compliance?

Factory location alone does not determine the origin of every end product or whether the procurement is covered. The applicable clauses and the product-specific origin determination still matter.

Are TAA and non-FEOC interchangeable?

No. They apply different sourcing and applicability tests. The research records leave product classifications unassessed unless the necessary procurement-specific evidence is established.